Is Mangalasutra symbol of oppression?
- Sacred feminine
- 15 hours ago
- 2 min read
Recently I saw an Instagram post on Manfalsutra where a self loathing Hindu was telling his wife she doesn’t need to wear mangalasutra as it’s unfair only woman has to show she’s married.
Yeah that’s typical leftist mindset wannabe Europeans or self loathing wannabe abramhic mindset. Who told u mangalsutra is symbol to show she’s married ? in Hindu philosophy Body is yantra to achieve oneness with your Isht Devi or Devata . It is about becoming a goddess … and all these jewelry is her 16 solah sringar of Devi that activates and makes her walking Devi . I’ve already written a post on 16Sringar! we want to bring the most auspicious Devi into the house Lakshmi not Alakshmi which is represented as a goddess who doesn’t wear any jewelry and is a widow now u decide what u want to bring into your life and family! Indian Rishis were wise to know how to respect woman who has the potential to become a living goddess just by adorning certain type of sringar and sadhana . Obviously the sadhana is lost , a great damage has occurred on the one entity that can help us do sadhana that is Guru. Anyway I digress, atleast we are following the sringar and still activating the right Devi within her. So yeah be woke and leftist and attract all bad luck in your life by activating Alakshmi what do I care
nope men can’t become Devi this is not some trans ideology. Devi Durga herself told I’m present in every women now go argue with her why she did not include men n it’s discrimination!🙄🙄 men are shiva swaroop not Devi swaroop it’s not on men to activate anything except guru tattva in them which is shiva guna. Does shiva wear ornaments or he’s smeared with ashes? It doesn’t matter what he wears as shakti runs the world n shiv observes that’s what why adorn your woman . Man Wearing or not wearing jewelry doesn’t matter at all.
All my knowledge comes from my Guru Kaulantak Nath Ishaputra
